Essential Disaster Essay Topics

Essential Disaster Essay TopicsDisaster studies are unique in their nature as they offer students an exciting opportunity to provide the latest disaster writing topics. Because of the recent occurrence of several tragic events, there is a growing demand for reliable disaster writing. The resourceful student will be able to provide many new perspectives on previous topics and present fresh evidence regarding the reasons behind them.Disaster essay topics vary according to the type of disaster that occurred. For example, if the earthquake was a massive impact on a wide area of the city, it could lead to a nationwide debate about the safety of the building. Should the city continue to accept such large events? In a similar fashion, the issue of fire, flood, or hurricane damage would garner a large amount of attention.Each natural disaster can be further broken down into different types. There are earthquakes, flooding, fires, hurricanes, and tornadoes among others. Natural disasters ofte n have several causes that must be considered. Therefore, a thorough study of the reasons behind the disaster will be necessary in order to demonstrate how things may have been different.At the heart of every natural disaster is the question of human responsibility. For example, why was the event occurring? Was it man-made or natural? It should be noted that the natural disasters that have taken place this year are more widespread than ever before.For the main questions, the standard answer will be 'human error.' However, a deeper examination of the causes behind these errors will lead to evidence that may prove otherwise. Consider the earthquake in Los Angeles and why a number of insurance companies claimed that it was caused by an earthquake in Norway.For the reasons that are generally accepted, it is also important to look at the damage that was caused by the disaster. Sometimes, this will involve a direct review of the exact location of the disaster and the expenses incurred for the cleanup, as well as the loss of property, physical harm, and death.If a student wishes to use their knowledge of an incident to provide a scientific basis for future disaster studies, this will be a good choice. The questions will likely be broader, and focus on what sort of disasters we should expect, in terms of the frequency of the disasters and when they will occur. This may include the importance of natural disasters in predicting an outbreak of disease or pandemic, as well as how global warming and climate change affect natural disasters.Natural disaster essay topics provide students with a unique opportunity to explore the psychology of humans and the repercussions of life threatening events. They are valuable tools for students who want to increase their abilities in this area and sharpen their writing skills. Writing for the learning community is a valuable part of any college education, and it can be even more helpful when a student can provide relevant topics.

Starbucks vs. Tim Hortons

Debates about coffee exist since Hortons and Starbucks, the two major coffee joints, were launched. Both Hortons and Starbucks have some similar features and the common feature is that they both serve coffee and donuts. Hortons and Starbucks serve more coffee than any other product.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Starbucks vs. Tim Hortons specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Certainly, Starbucks is much more famous than Tim Hortons since it provides quality products, free internet access, and various samples for its customers to try. It has popularized itself in social networks such as Facebook and Twitter (Walsh, 2010). Starbucks is using different approaches to cope with current competitive settings and provides quality products which satisfy its customers. Services of Starbucks and Hortons Starbucks provides quality products which most customers have appreciated despite their prices. Customers who sign up for Sta rbucks become members of Starbucks rewards, their balances are protected if their cards are stolen or misplaced, and obtain gifts on their birthdays. These are not the only benefits customers receive from Starbucks which have made it more popular than Hortons. Starbucks has made history by becoming the first company to obtain ten million fans on Facebook, social networking site. They are ahead of Coca-Cola by more than three million fans. Starbucks has participated in supporting organization like Starbucks China Education Project and China Soong Ching Ling Foundation. They donated US$6.75 million to support projects intended at supporting teachers and children in rural regions of China (QSR, 2012). Starbucks also donated US$800,000 to the China Women Development Foundation that was initiated to help projects which are intended at supporting Chinese women receive access to essential services like safe drinking water (QSR, 2012). Prices One thing which mostly differentiates the two is their prices, where Hortons is much cheaper than Starbucks. Tim Hortons is less expensive and favors workers coming from small businesses. Most people consider that Hortons is involved in unfair trade and this makes their products cheaper than Starbucks. Farmers who sell their products to Hortons are paid low prices. However, Starbucks ensure that these farmers are paid correct amount of money for their products they supply to Starbucks. Most people consider that Starbucks provide quality products to their customers compared to Hortons.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Starbucks alters their drinks precisely the way they want it, while Hortons often add flavor substances to their drinks to increase taste and reduce extra expenses (Barnea, 2011). Although Tim Hortons is a fastest developing coffee joint in Canada and United States, Starbucks is also catching up due to their q uality products it offers to its customers. Most companies and businesses are going green in this competitive environment. Starbucks offers environmental friendly products. It provides sleeves to put on coffee cups to prevent hands from burning and sleeves are manufactured from 60 percent consumer fiber. Even their coffee cups are manufactured from recycled papers that make their products eco-friendly. Hortons does not provide these sleeves and their cups are doubled. They are not manufactured from consumer fibers or recycled papers to prevent hands from burning. Strategies of Starbucks Starbucks has opened more branches than Hortons. The key motivation which pushes Starbucks to launch more branches globally is to obtain access to bigger markets. It benefits from various associations and joint ventures to develop its market control overseas. It has opened more branches outside Canada and United States that have been developed by its aim of becoming environmental leader in all aspect s of their business. Starbucks intends to manage a business that possesses quality standards and is beyond reproach in the domestic and international business market. Starbucks expanded its business internationally to increase its market limit and carry on to develop its business. Starbucks has opened branches in 43 countries due to its target of keeping a better and stronger market (Walsh, 2010). All countries which Starbucks has opened branches have their own practices and cultural differences. Starbucks uses associations and joint ventures to help ease some of the difficulties of growing overseas. There are around 750 stores which have been opened in Japan and these were made possible by joint ventures with Japanese companies which permitted it to achieve cultural understanding (Walsh, 2010). Starbucks has been working to provide a range of essential products, but it is not limiting itself in new products either. It works to make new products for various geographic regions due to the conflicting cultural experiences which match them. Starbucks is eager to respond to various conflicting cultural and environmental factors and due to that, it has been equipped to develop radically as a company since its started initially in a small store in Seattle. Conclusion Both Starbucks and Hortons are well-known companies in several countries. They have their own strategies which make their customers keep on coming to buy their products. Starbucks is much more famous than Hortons because of its quality products. However, more employees from small businesses visit frequently Hortons to have cheaper and affordable coffee and other products.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Starbucks vs. Tim Hortons specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Prices at Starbucks are almost double the prices of products in Hortons, but most customers consider that their products are high quality than Hortons. Starbucks has expanded into international market using different strategies to attain its target and prevent all challenges which are experienced in different cultures abroad. References Barnea, A. (2011). Lack of peripheral vision: How Starbucks failed in Israel. African Journal of Marketing Management , 3(4): 78-88. QSR. (2012). Starbucks to Support Rural Education in China. Web. Walsh, M. (2010). Starbucks Tops 10 Million Facebook Fans. Retrieved from https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/132008/ This essay on Starbucks vs. Tim Hortons was written and submitted by user Harley S. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Gender Differences In Visual And Tactile Line Bisection Essays

Gender Differences In Visual And Tactile Line Bisection Running Head: ATTENTIONAL BIAS IN NORMAL SUBJECTS Gender Differences in Visual and Tactile Line Bisection: Attentional Bias in Normal Subjects Abstract Attentional bias in line bisections may be influenced by the position of the stimulus, the type of stimulus, and the gender of the bisector. Past research has found that below eye level bisection stimuli is biased away from the body in the visual mode, and towards the body in the tactile mode. Above eye level bisections have not been significantly biased in either direction due to a cancellation of the object centered bias by the body centered bias. Research has also concluded that no gender differences are statistically significant in attentional bias studies, using line bisection tasks. This report suggests that gender differences are statistically significant in favor of male subjects, when using above eye level stimuli, and when using tactile stimuli. Overall, however, these differences become statistically insignificant, when combined with below eye level tasks and visual tasks. Current findings also point to a trend towards supporting past research findings which state that in below eye level bisections both males and females are biased away from the body in the visual mode, and towards the body in the tactile mode. Gender Differences in Visual and Tactile Line Bisections: Attentional Bias in Normal Subjects The act of survival requires humans to pay attention to their surroundings. In order to pay attention to surroundings, one must allocate resources of attention to the space around ones body. Taking a common sense approach, the sense of vision and the sense of touch would be the candidates for most important senses in terms of survival. For example, imagine a primitive hunter trying to catch prey, using only his sense of smell; or imagine someone trying to build a hut, without the use of sensitive fingers to wield tools. Vision is generally used as a means to detect and interpret objects at a distance, whereas, touch is used to detect and interpret objects which are relatively close to the body. Historically, visual and tactile attention have been studied along a left-right horizontal axis (Shelton, Bowers, however, there has been a recent expansion of this research, into the vertical and radial axes. The current study will attempt to confirm the findings of Geldmacher and Heilman (1 994), Jeerakathil and Kirk (1994), and Drain and Reuter-Lorenz (1996) that below eye level bisection stimuli will be biased away from the body (far peripersonal space) in the visual mode, and towards the body (near peripersonal space) in the tactile mode. Above eye level bisections should not be significantly biased, however, due to a cancellation of biases i.e., the object centered bias nullifies body centered bias. Drain and Reuter-Lorenz (1996) are one of the only research teams to have considered gender as a factor in the results of such studies. They concluded that although gender does contribute to real sex differences, it is not a significant factor in assessing attentional bias in normal subjects on line bisection tasks, due to the minuteness of these differences. However, given the common perception that males are superior to females in tasks of visuo-spatial dexterity (Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974, Caplan, MacPherson, & Tobin, 1985, Newcombe & Dubas, 1992, all as cited in Dworetzky, 1996), it should be a natural to examine the results of men vis-?-vis women. Thus, in the spirit of gender equality and the pursuit of confirming such a hypothesis, the current study will include gender as a factor of analysis. In 1994, Geldmacher and Heilman studied 10 normal subjects in radial line bisection tasks. That is, they had participants determine where the middles of lines were, when the lines ran outward from the subjects bodies, on a horizontal plane. They found that significant near peripersonal misbisections occurred in the above eye level tasks. Whereas, far peripersonal misbisections were replicated in the below eye level tasks. Further, Jeerakathil and Kirk (1994) found similar results. Their study showed significant bisection biases towards the TOP (they used labels at each end of stimulus lines: TOP, BOTTOM) of both horizontal and vertical lines, as well as in the below eye level radial condition. Again, the